Which is weird because I thought that all branches of government kind of had to deal with things that were constitutional or not.
(And, quick sidebar, how weird was it that he had a Twitter Town Hall Forum?? I mean, I'm not upset or frustrated, just perplexed. It... it was... eh. I don't have the energy.)
And Sen. Mitch McConnell said today that his side wasn't "absolutist". "We have a better term for it -- common sense." Now, say what you want about liberals being condescending, what McConnell said, that is condescending enough for Barbara Streisand.
Think of the debt crisis as this: You have a credit card that you're way, way, way over. You've been on time on payments, so you're credit is good, but you're getting to the point where you are going to make sacrifices. Otherwise, men in black suits are going to break down the door and take you and your family away in silent helicopters to a compound in Nebraska.
You could a) stop spending money on the card in the amounts that you have, b) raise your income level or c) both of these things. The "common sense" option is C! You deal with the issue that much faster and you don't have to have it continual hanging over your head!
But then you're spouse comes in and says "Don't get a better paying job!!! Why would you do that? You're going to stifle the growth of this house if you get a better paying job!!!" And all you can really do is stare back and wonder how is it that you've been married for so long.
"But we have to do something to deal with this credit card."
"Well, turn off a light switch when you leave a room."
"That's not going to help with the debt I owe, just the amount of bills that I would have coming in."
"If you get a better paying job, it's socialism."
Okay, it's not a perfect metaphor, but it's sound. By insisting on spending cuts, the GOP are only fixing the issue of the amount of debt that will be owed, not the current amount of debt. Obama/WH/Democrats/Rational people are trying to take a balanced approach, one that appeases the Right by making drastic (and I mean drastic cuts to spending) but one that shares the burden of supporting the government to those that afford to take a hit.
And it's not to say that having a balanced approach is always the right thing to do, but in this case, it makes good sense. It's good economics, it's the only way that the debt is going to be taken care of any time soon and that must be the only reason why the GOP is so adamant against it.
But back to the Nuclear Option/14th Amendment/The Constitution: Obama downplayed his thoughts on the option. He didn't say "I will not cite the 14th Amendment to prevent the country from defaulting on it's debt." He's given the process another two weeks. In two weeks, we will either have a balanced approach on the matter or you'll need a Geiger Counter to start walking through the halls of Congress.
On a side note, I'm going to starting writing this blog on a site called www.nuzcom.com. Please go over and give the site a once over. It's a good forum and has good writers about the place. Check it out!